In a part of the Ethernereum Ecosystem, Vitalik Buterin gives an overview of the proposals for Ethereum’s L1 and L2 scaling, focusing on data loops and proof systems to deal with network demands.
His latest blog posting explained that he had adjusted the interaction initiative to expand to Blob capacity and simplify cross -chain operations. This post emphasized the plan to balance the technical solution and the social structure of Ethereum, and emphasized that a single chain could not meet all needs without risking decentralization. Buterin has proposed that L2 better security can be experimented with various virtual machines through multiple proof systems and standardized bridges.
Buterin emphasizes the role of “Blob” space expansion as an immediate solution to alleviate the congestion of layer-2, suggesting that it must respond to data demand, which increases the basics of Ethereum. Currently, the ecosystem is processing about three blobs (210 transactions per second) for each slot, but with a pectra and peerdas label, this throughput is doubled or tripled.
He emphasizes the need for a adjusted roadmap, and the stakeering mechanism may adjust the Blob target in accordance with technical improvements. Buterin also mentioned a more experimental concept, including the partial assumptions of a stager with less resources, but paid attention to the risks that would impair Ethereum’s core principles. 。
He explained that interoperability is a central priority. Roll -up functions like a unique shard controlled by various entities, leading to a message pass and an inconsistent standard for address format. This creates a croschine tool that maintains unreliable security, rather than a multi -sigbridge fragmented with developers and users.
Buterin has proposed a unified method for verifying proof, acceleration time, drawer time, and chain -specific address, including the identifier of each layer 2 environment. Some developers consider this approach as an important step for user -friendly cross -chain navigation, but BUTERIN emphasizes that maintaining explicit security is still important for all implementations. I did.
ETHEREUM ETH value of ecosystem protects
This post is also an economic incentive to strengthen ETH as a triple point asset, burning fees in roll -up, continuous data charges from “Blob”, and potential maximum extraction value. Note that the combination of chains from the channel can fix the financial role of Ethereum. 。
He stated that an ecosystem system needed to do it
“I overly agree to strengthen ETH, such as supporting applications that use ETH as a major collateral as a major asset in Ethereum economy.”
He argued that roll -up should be potentially and potentially depositing some fees in Ethereum’s ecosystems with the permanent stake or targeted funds of public goods. However, he warned that the price structure and demand remain uncertain and there is no single mechanism to guarantee ETH long -term price support.
The adoption and roll-up of layer-2 are currently promoting the growth of the ecosystem, but in Butarin emphasizes that complete transition to roll-up requires both technical progress and social adjustments. I did. He urged developers to focus on the standard for integrating the proof system for production, shared sequence solutions, and cross -roll -up operations.
He also invites a new address format and bridging protocol to the wallet provider, and to achieve these goals requires direct collaboration between Ethereum Foundation, client teams, and layer 2 projects. I explained.
Buterin’s post reminds me that Ethereum’s social spirit supports technical blue photos. He sought direct involvement from all stakeholders, including tokens, which could affect roadmap decisions by involved in governance and open discussion.
He stated that the evolution of the network depends on the balance of scaling abilities, maintaining security and maintaining a cohesive user experience. The final message required a continuous collaboration to guarantee that Ethereum is an open platform that can support distributed applications widely.
Ethernereum Foundation leadership and financial movements
In the rebuilding of the leadership of the community division and the Ethereum Foundation, this post focuses on compliance with decentralization and privacy, while strengthening the collaboration of developers. When trying to maintain neutrality in political issues, the Foundation continues to emphasize the commitment of developing protocol development without engaging in ideologies and lobby activities.
However, the role of Buterin as a co -founder has been discussed endlessly in social media, and some people are asking him to be more involved in the Ethereum Project and the NFT collection, but others are complete. We are looking for neutrality.
The community is promoting the story that EtherEum’s success depends on maintaining both the robust L1 and the prosperous L2 ecosystem that can handle various use cases. Buterin’s blog emphasizes the importance of a flexible but minimized system, and is looking for an L2 recruitment that reflects the early vision of Ethereum’s Shark architecture.
He claimed that by giving priority to the Blob Throbput and the shared roll -up standard, developers could improve Defi, social applications, and enterprise solutions. He also pointed out the unified address format, the final nature of a higher -speed transaction, and the need for a cross -chain message protocol so that the user can navigate different L2 without a fragmented workflow.
It is mentioned in this article
