Below is a guest post from Georgi Koreli, CEO and co-founder of Hinkal.
For years, crypto wallets have been as transparent as glass, indicating all transactions, balances, and interactions in open ledgers. This was once considered a fundamental asset in blockchain technology, but many now see it as a significant weakness. According to State Street Global Advisors 62% of institutional investors Prefers indirect or regulated exposure to Crypto. In an ecosystem that aims to be exchanged or rival Tradfi, it is a serious responsibility to not be able to keep business secret.
The recent Buybit Hack, which cost $1.5 billion on the platform, is Caused by a wallet compromise – It enhances the dangers of ultra-transparency. Hackers can focus on high-value accounts, track activity and launch accurately targeted attacks. Experts such as Vitalik Buterin and Paul Brody from EY It emphasizes that authentic adoptions depend on the incorporation of privacy rather than relying on open ledgers. Despite these warnings, the crypto world remains primarily adherent to models that make participants vulnerable.
Fatal flaws in public wallets
A closer look at public wallets reveals multiple vulnerabilities. Monitoring is the first. All token exchanges, NFT mint, or simple balance transfers are obviously chained and given sufficient data, allowing observers to connect wallet balances and patterns regarding spending, investments and peer connections. For private users, this is an absolute deal vandal for institutions that need to protect competitive information. No, thank you.
Furthermore, if all wallet holdings are general knowledge, security threats increase. Hackers can discover large cache caches and mount sophisticated phishing and social engineering tactics. A Bibit Incident is an impressive example of what happens when a malicious entity is locked to a prominent address. If the funds are washed using a mixer or other means, recovery becomes almost impossible. This visibility is not just a risk for institutions that manage large Treasury ministries or carry out strategic transactions. It is a structural flaw that exposes them to the front and tor.
Finally, the highly regulated and competitive hurdles arise from the idea that full openness automatically fills surveillance. Traditional compliance relies on regulated gateways, risk assessments, and audited disclosures. This is not the broad and lasting spotlight offered by public blockchains. Companies need to keep information confidential when negotiating transactions and sharing financial details with their partners. If all transactions are visible to competitors immediately, it will undermine your strategic edge. In short, public wallets aren’t just inconvenient. They chip crypto business cases in real-world scenarios.
Private blockchain: A mirage of security?
Some companies are turning to private blockchains to solve these transparency issues. Private blockchains restrict participation in closure groups and prevent the public from accessing transaction details. However, this violates the core principles of decentralization. Small consortiums can change rules, block transactions, and manage their systems in ways that go against the cryptography-free ethos.
In addition, private blockchains often undermine liquidity and complexity. One of the critical features of Defi is how different platforms interact. When they split into isolated private networks, their ecosystems have an impact. Additionally, external developers lose the incentive to build on a controlled environment that is not freely accessible.
Despite their initial appeal, private chains can hamper collaboration and hamper innovations that have driven the growth of public networks. The best solution needs to balance the ethos of privacy and open source, which is characteristic of public blockchains.
ZK’s Privacy Wallet
The real path to mainstream adoption lies in privacy wallets that use encryption technologies such as ZK-SNARK and stealth addresses. ZK-Snarks (non-dialogue of concise knowledge of zero knowledge) allows one party to prove a statement (such as transaction verification) without revealing the details of that statement. Instead of broadcasting all token movements, the blockchain only receives confirmation that the transaction follows the rules.
Stealth addresses, on the other hand, help to keep sender and receiver identities hidden by creating a temporary, single-use address for each transaction. This will preserve the liquidity and complexity of the public blockchain while protecting personal information. Selective disclosure allows users to provide detailed transaction history to relevant regulators or auditors without having to put everything in public records. This design resolves the tension between compliance demands and legitimate expectations of privacy.
These features allow institutions to trade large token volumes without broadcasting trades to the forefront. Companies can handle corporate expenses and salaries without revealing sensitive numbers. Similarly, individual users enjoy the same discretion they have experienced for a long time in traditional banking. Meanwhile, the network remains decentralized, accessible and vibrant.
Balance of privacy, compliance and security
Critics sometimes mistake privacy for disorder, but that’s false equivalence. Traditional banks do not publish personal account data that everyone can see, but follow KYC, AML and other regulatory frameworks. The privacy wallet model grants decryption privileges to accredited bodies (with appropriate legal basis) and may reduce the risk of unconfirmed crimes. The result is a system in which user privacy and regulatory compliance coexist.
It is also important to note that privacy features do not make robust cybersecurity redundant. Bibit Hacks demonstrated the need for multisig wallets, hardware-based key storage, and general best practices to protect digital assets. Privacy wallets only reduce hacker incentives by considering maintaining a great balance.
Public Wallet Completed – Call for the Confidential Future
In conclusion, public wallets are outdated in a world where serious businesses demand confidentiality and everyday users react with complete transparency. It’s no coincidence that celebrities like Vitalik Buterin and Paul Brody are urging the industry to step up privacy measures. Mass adoption is not carried out while all transactions are exposed to the whims of data miners, hackers and uncruel competitors.
The key is that if cryptography wants to eclipse tradfi, the entire industry must adapt. All transparency is a relic of the past, hindering the use of businesses, putting personal safety at risk and institutional investment.
Privacy Wallet represents an intermediate that holds the core benefits of public blockchains (open access, network effects, seamless interoperability) and fixes the lack of confidentiality while fixing the biggest flaws. The introduction of stealth addressing, ZK-snarks and selective disclosure paves the way for universal utilities. Reduce hacking incentives, deal with institutional fears, and increase user autonomy.
Therefore, the conclusion is clear. Public wallets no longer fit the trajectory of the rapidly mature cryptocurrency ecosystem. Adopting a wallet focused on privacy is a transition that really makes digital assets viable in the broader financial sector. If you want to compete with an established financial system, privacy is missing and you can’t afford to overlook it.
It is mentioned in this article
